Lawmakers in a growing number of states are imposing restrictions on 3D-printed firearms, sparking debate over Second Amendment rights and gun control.

In short, all nine justices agreed that the federal government's prosecution of this particular nonviolent marijuana user for possessing a gun violated the constitutional right to keep and bear arms. To call this decision a huge win for the Second Amendment would be an understatement.

The Supreme Court has dealt a significant Second Amendment ruling limiting how far federal authorities can go in enforcing firearm restrictions against marijuana users, in a unanimous 9–0 decision that challenges the government's approach to drug-related gun bans.

Add Yahoo as a preferred source to see more of our stories on Google. Three variations of the AR-15 rifle are displayed at the California Department of Justice in Sacramento. (Rich Pedroncelli / Associated Press) A closely divided Supreme Court refused ...

Vagrancy laws usually targeted those who 'did not meet the societal expectation of work,' W. Quigley, Reluctant Charity: Poor Laws in the Original Thirteen States, 31 U. Rich. L. Rev. 111, 169 (1997), and sought to promote productivity and suppress various vices, not to protect the public from a category of unusually dangerous persons.

On June 4, 2026, the Appellate Court of Maryland ruled that law enforcement cannot stop and search a person merely because they see a gun—or the outline of one printing from a concealed holster.

A top official with the Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) warned lawmakers in the Virgin Islands Friday that gun control bills being debated there could be thrown out in court. SAF sent Democratic Territorial Senate President Milton Potter a letter Wednesday that warned pending court cases could declare proposed provisions,

The author writes, "Once again, Minnesota's Republican legislators prevented the state from joining 11 other states that ban assault-style weapons."